“胡亦台”的意思、由来-中文百科全书

简介

胡亦台是 Alston & Bird LLP 律师事务所知识产权诉讼团队的合伙人。在2008 年，《知识产权法与商务》杂志把他评为“50 位45 岁以下的顶尖知识产权律师之一”。胡律师的业务重点是国际知识产权诉讼与客户咨询。在诉讼方面，他曾在美国地区联邦法院和州法院审理的30 个案件中担任过首席律师。这些案件涉及专利、商业机密、许可争议等。他在美国国际贸易委员会第337 条调查案方面经验丰富，曾受理过18 个案件, 其中10 个案件他曾担任过首席律师。在诉讼案中胡律师代表的客户分别涉及如下技术领域：半导体技术、非易失存储器、液晶显示器、发光二极管、计算机显示器、投影机、光学鼠标技术、计算机网络产品、无线网络通讯产品、集成电路包装、微处理器技术、数子电路设计等。他还在美国及海外对案件进行过仲裁，所涉及的内容为许可与技术转让之争议。

在美国之外，胡律师也参与由法院和行政法律程序所处理的专利案件。他协助客户处理过知识产权剽窃和盗用案，包括查找海外盗版商标与版权产品的源头，办理搜查证，缉获盗版产品，并通过刑事及民事诉讼追究相关人员的责任。

胡律师代表过客户就不少复杂的国际专利与技术许可协议进行谈判。他的咨询业务也包括技术型公司的合并与收购。

胡律师是加利福尼亚州、马里兰州、哥伦比亚特区（首都华盛顿）律师协会的成员。他被批准在如下地区与法庭执业：美国北加州地区联邦法院及加州中部地区联邦法院、哥伦比亚特区联邦法院、威斯康辛西区联邦法院、密歇根东区联邦法院、美国联邦巡回上诉法院、美国专利与商标局。

他常常在会议和研讨会上就国际知识产权法发表演讲，其主题也包括在中国大陆与台湾对美国知识产权的保护。胡律师目前还兼任台湾国立交通大学的助理教授，讲授美国专利诉讼方面的课程。就美国的诉讼问题，他应邀对台湾司法界（包括新成立的知识产权法庭）提供培训。从2004 到2006 年，他是《专利世界》杂志的编辑部成员。

主要诉讼案件

胡亦台律师参与的主要诉讼案件，如下

The following are representative cases where Mr. Hu acted as lead counsel unless otherwise indicated:

1. DISTRICT COURT CASES

《联邦地方法院的诉讼》

Avago v. Elan Microelectronics Corp.

Northern District of California (Case No. 5:04-cv-05385)

Elan Microelectronics Corp v. Apple Inc.

Northern District of California (Case No. 5:09-cv-01531)

Elan Microelectronics Corp v. Pixcir Microelectronics Co., Ltd., Pixcir AG

District Court of Nevada (Case No. 2:2010-cv-00014)

Elantech Devices Corporation v. Synaptics and Averatec

Northern District of California (Case No. 5:06-cv-01839)

Synaptics v. Elantech Devices Corporation

Northern District of California (Case No. 3:07-cv-06434)

Seiko Epson Corporation v. Coretronic Corporation and Optoma Technology,

Inc.

Northern District of California (Case No. 3:06-cv-06946)

Avepoint Inc. v. Janalent Corp.

District of New Jersey (Case No. 09-cv-03694)

Ours Technology Inc. (OTi) v. Data Drive Thru, Inc.

Northern District of California (Case No. 3:09-cv-00585)

Data Drive Thru Inc v. Radioshack Corporation et al

Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:08-cv-00485)

3Com v. D-Link and Realtek Semiconductor Corporation

Northern District of California (Case No. C03-2 177)

Adams v. Dell et al. (representing 3rd party defendant Winbond Electronics

Corp.)

District of Utah (Case No. 1 :05-cv-64)

Guardian Industries, Inc. v. Proview International Holdings, Ltd., Proview

Technology, Inc., and Proview Electronic Co. et al

District of Delaware (Case No. 05-cv-0027)

Positive Technologies, Inc. v. Proview Technology, Inc. et al

Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:07-cv-0067)

Nichia Corp v. Jiawei North America Inc., Jiawei Technology (HK) Ltd., and

Shenzhen Jiawei Industries Co., Ltd.

Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:09-cv-346)

Epistar Corporation v. Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC

Northern District of California, Case No. 07-5194 CW

Lenovo Singapore Pte., Ltd. v. Clevo Computer Company

Southern District of New York (Case No. 1 :07-cv-01 843)

Shuffle Master v. Taiwan Fulgent Enterprise Co. Ltd.

District of Nevada (Case No. 2:09-cv-02 194)

Lite-On IT Corporation v. Toshiba Corp.

American Arbitration Association (Reference No. 50-133-T-000386-06)

Central District of California (Case No. 2:07-cv-04758)

Synchrome v. Lite-On (USA) International, Inc.

Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 4:06-cv-00155)

Mosaid v. ProMOS Technologies, Inc. and Mosel Vitelic, Inc.

Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:06-cv-302)

Hitachi Ltd. v. Proview International Holdings, Ltd., et al.

Northern District of California (Case No. C05-cv-02305)

Clevo Corporation v. Hecny Shipping Limited, Hecny Group, Manaus-AM Brasil,

Hecny Transportation Inc., MI

Central District of California (Case No. 2:09-cv-09 135)

2. ITC 337 Case

《美国国际贸易委员会(USITC) 的337 调查》

Inv. No. 337-TA-714, Certain Electronic Devices With Multi-Touch Enabled

Touchpads and Touchscreens

Representing complainant Elan Microelectronics Corp.

Inv. No. 337-TA-711, Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads and Components

Thereof

Represented respondent Microjet Technology Co., Ltd.

Inv. No. 337-TA-698, Certain DC-DC Controllers, and Products Containing Same

Representing complainant Richtek Technology Corp.

XParallel district court case in California

Inv. No. 337-TA-691, Inkjet Ink Supplies and Components Thereof

Represented Zhuhai Gree Magneto-Electric Co., Ltd.

Inv. No. 337-TA-640, Certain Short-Wavelength Light Emitting Diodes, Laser Diodes

and Products Containing Same

Represented respondents Unity Opto Technology, FOREPI, Exceed

Perseverance Electronic Ind. Co., Ltd., and Lucky Light Electronics Co.,

Ltd.

Inv. No. 337-TA-619, Flash Memory Controllers, Drives, Memory Cards, and Media

Players and Products Containing Same

Represented respondents Skymedi Corp. and Transcend Information, Inc.

(co-counsel; did not attend trial)

Parallel district court case Wisconsin

Inv. No. 337-TA-617, Digital Televisions and Certain Products Containing Same and

Methods of Using Same

Representing respondent AmTran Technology Co., Ltd. (Post-hearing issues

and Customs clearance)

Inv. No. 337-TA-600, Certain Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries, Components

Thereof, and Products Containing Same

Represented respondents Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo (U.S.), Inc.

Inv. No. 337-TA-589, Certain Switches and Products Containing Same

Represented complainants ATEN International Co. Ltd., ATEN Technology,

Inc.

Inv. No. 337-TA-556, Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes and Products

Containing Same

Represented respondent Epistar Corp.

XParallel district court action in California

Inv. No. 337-TA-531, Certain Network Controllers and Products Containing Same

Represented respondents Realtek Semiconductor Corporation, and Real

Communications, Inc.

Inv. No. 337-TA-523, Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips and Chipsets and

Products Containing Same, Including DVD Players and PC Optical Storage Devices II

Represented respondent Sunext Technology

Inv. No. 337-TA-506, Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips and Chipsets and Products

Containing Same, Including D\\TD Players and PC Optical Storage Devices

Represented complainant Zoran (co-counsel)

Inv. No. 337-TA-491, Certain Display Controllers and Products Containing Same

Represented MStar Semiconductor, Inc. (post-hearing issues and customs

clearance)

Inv. No. 337-TA-435, Certain Integrated Repeaters, Switches, Transceivers and

Products Containing Same

Represented respondent Altima Communications, Inc.

Inv. No. 337-TA-428, Certain Integrated Circuit Chipsets, Components Thereof and

Products Containing Same

Representing respondents First International Computer Inc., First

International Computer of America, Inc., and Everex Systems, Inc.

Inv. No. 337-TA-401, Certain CD-ROM Controllers and Products Containing Same

Represented respondent Winbond Electronics Corp.

Inv. No. 337-TA-395, Certain EPROM, EEPROM, Flash Memory and Flash

Microcontroller Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing Same

Represented respondent Winbond Electronics Corp.

词条	胡亦台
释义	简介(学历: 律师资格: 语言：) 专业背景主要诉讼案件(1. DISTRICT COURT CASES 2. ITC 337 Case) 简介学历: 马里兰大学 (1994 年法学博士)■ 堪萨斯大学 (1991 年物理学士) 律师资格: 加利福尼亚州　■ 哥伦比亚特区　■ 马里兰州　■ 美国专利与商标局语言：中文 ■ 英语专业背景胡亦台是 Alston & Bird LLP 律师事务所知识产权诉讼团队的合伙人。在2008 年，《知识产权法与商务》杂志把他评为“50 位45 岁以下的顶尖知识产权律师之一”。胡律师的业务重点是国际知识产权诉讼与客户咨询。在诉讼方面，他曾在美国地区联邦法院和州法院审理的30 个案件中担任过首席律师。这些案件涉及专利、商业机密、许可争议等。他在美国国际贸易委员会第337 条调查案方面经验丰富，曾受理过18 个案件, 其中10 个案件他曾担任过首席律师。在诉讼案中胡律师代表的客户分别涉及如下技术领域：半导体技术、非易失存储器、液晶显示器、发光二极管、计算机显示器、投影机、光学鼠标技术、计算机网络产品、无线网络通讯产品、集成电路包装、微处理器技术、数子电路设计等。他还在美国及海外对案件进行过仲裁，所涉及的内容为许可与技术转让之争议。在美国之外，胡律师也参与由法院和行政法律程序所处理的专利案件。他协助客户处理过知识产权剽窃和盗用案，包括查找海外盗版商标与版权产品的源头，办理搜查证，缉获盗版产品，并通过刑事及民事诉讼追究相关人员的责任。胡律师代表过客户就不少复杂的国际专利与技术许可协议进行谈判。他的咨询业务也包括技术型公司的合并与收购。胡律师是加利福尼亚州、马里兰州、哥伦比亚特区（首都华盛顿）律师协会的成员。他被批准在如下地区与法庭执业：美国北加州地区联邦法院及加州中部地区联邦法院、哥伦比亚特区联邦法院、威斯康辛西区联邦法院、密歇根东区联邦法院、美国联邦巡回上诉法院、美国专利与商标局。他常常在会议和研讨会上就国际知识产权法发表演讲，其主题也包括在中国大陆与台湾对美国知识产权的保护。胡律师目前还兼任台湾国立交通大学的助理教授，讲授美国专利诉讼方面的课程。就美国的诉讼问题，他应邀对台湾司法界（包括新成立的知识产权法庭）提供培训。从2004 到2006 年，他是《专利世界》杂志的编辑部成员。主要诉讼案件胡亦台律师参与的主要诉讼案件，如下 The following are representative cases where Mr. Hu acted as lead counsel unless otherwise indicated: 1. DISTRICT COURT CASES 《联邦地方法院的诉讼》 Avago v. Elan Microelectronics Corp. Northern District of California (Case No. 5:04-cv-05385) Elan Microelectronics Corp v. Apple Inc. Northern District of California (Case No. 5:09-cv-01531) Elan Microelectronics Corp v. Pixcir Microelectronics Co., Ltd., Pixcir AG District Court of Nevada (Case No. 2:2010-cv-00014) Elantech Devices Corporation v. Synaptics and Averatec Northern District of California (Case No. 5:06-cv-01839) Synaptics v. Elantech Devices Corporation Northern District of California (Case No. 3:07-cv-06434) Seiko Epson Corporation v. Coretronic Corporation and Optoma Technology, Inc. Northern District of California (Case No. 3:06-cv-06946) Avepoint Inc. v. Janalent Corp. District of New Jersey (Case No. 09-cv-03694) Ours Technology Inc. (OTi) v. Data Drive Thru, Inc. Northern District of California (Case No. 3:09-cv-00585) Data Drive Thru Inc v. Radioshack Corporation et al Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:08-cv-00485) 3Com v. D-Link and Realtek Semiconductor Corporation Northern District of California (Case No. C03-2 177) Adams v. Dell et al. (representing 3rd party defendant Winbond Electronics Corp.) District of Utah (Case No. 1 :05-cv-64) Guardian Industries, Inc. v. Proview International Holdings, Ltd., Proview Technology, Inc., and Proview Electronic Co. et al District of Delaware (Case No. 05-cv-0027) Positive Technologies, Inc. v. Proview Technology, Inc. et al Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:07-cv-0067) Nichia Corp v. Jiawei North America Inc., Jiawei Technology (HK) Ltd., and Shenzhen Jiawei Industries Co., Ltd. Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:09-cv-346) Epistar Corporation v. Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC Northern District of California, Case No. 07-5194 CW Lenovo Singapore Pte., Ltd. v. Clevo Computer Company Southern District of New York (Case No. 1 :07-cv-01 843) Shuffle Master v. Taiwan Fulgent Enterprise Co. Ltd. District of Nevada (Case No. 2:09-cv-02 194) Lite-On IT Corporation v. Toshiba Corp. American Arbitration Association (Reference No. 50-133-T-000386-06) Central District of California (Case No. 2:07-cv-04758) Synchrome v. Lite-On (USA) International, Inc. Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 4:06-cv-00155) Mosaid v. ProMOS Technologies, Inc. and Mosel Vitelic, Inc. Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 2:06-cv-302) Hitachi Ltd. v. Proview International Holdings, Ltd., et al. Northern District of California (Case No. C05-cv-02305) Clevo Corporation v. Hecny Shipping Limited, Hecny Group, Manaus-AM Brasil, Hecny Transportation Inc., MI Central District of California (Case No. 2:09-cv-09 135) 2. ITC 337 Case 《美国国际贸易委员会(USITC) 的337 调查》 Inv. No. 337-TA-714, Certain Electronic Devices With Multi-Touch Enabled Touchpads and Touchscreens Representing complainant Elan Microelectronics Corp. Inv. No. 337-TA-711, Inkjet Ink Cartridges with Printheads and Components Thereof Represented respondent Microjet Technology Co., Ltd. Inv. No. 337-TA-698, Certain DC-DC Controllers, and Products Containing Same Representing complainant Richtek Technology Corp. XParallel district court case in California Inv. No. 337-TA-691, Inkjet Ink Supplies and Components Thereof Represented Zhuhai Gree Magneto-Electric Co., Ltd. Inv. No. 337-TA-640, Certain Short-Wavelength Light Emitting Diodes, Laser Diodes and Products Containing Same Represented respondents Unity Opto Technology, FOREPI, Exceed Perseverance Electronic Ind. Co., Ltd., and Lucky Light Electronics Co., Ltd. Inv. No. 337-TA-619, Flash Memory Controllers, Drives, Memory Cards, and Media Players and Products Containing Same Represented respondents Skymedi Corp. and Transcend Information, Inc. (co-counsel; did not attend trial) Parallel district court case Wisconsin Inv. No. 337-TA-617, Digital Televisions and Certain Products Containing Same and Methods of Using Same Representing respondent AmTran Technology Co., Ltd. (Post-hearing issues and Customs clearance) Inv. No. 337-TA-600, Certain Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same Represented respondents Lenovo Group Ltd., Lenovo (U.S.), Inc. Inv. No. 337-TA-589, Certain Switches and Products Containing Same Represented complainants ATEN International Co. Ltd., ATEN Technology, Inc. Inv. No. 337-TA-556, Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same Represented respondent Epistar Corp. XParallel district court action in California Inv. No. 337-TA-531, Certain Network Controllers and Products Containing Same Represented respondents Realtek Semiconductor Corporation, and Real Communications, Inc. Inv. No. 337-TA-523, Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips and Chipsets and Products Containing Same, Including DVD Players and PC Optical Storage Devices II Represented respondent Sunext Technology Inv. No. 337-TA-506, Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips and Chipsets and Products Containing Same, Including D\\TD Players and PC Optical Storage Devices Represented complainant Zoran (co-counsel) Inv. No. 337-TA-491, Certain Display Controllers and Products Containing Same Represented MStar Semiconductor, Inc. (post-hearing issues and customs clearance) Inv. No. 337-TA-435, Certain Integrated Repeaters, Switches, Transceivers and Products Containing Same Represented respondent Altima Communications, Inc. Inv. No. 337-TA-428, Certain Integrated Circuit Chipsets, Components Thereof and Products Containing Same Representing respondents First International Computer Inc., First International Computer of America, Inc., and Everex Systems, Inc. Inv. No. 337-TA-401, Certain CD-ROM Controllers and Products Containing Same Represented respondent Winbond Electronics Corp. Inv. No. 337-TA-395, Certain EPROM, EEPROM, Flash Memory and Flash Microcontroller Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing Same Represented respondent Winbond Electronics Corp.
随便看	朱以澖朱以芳朱以华朱以南朱以品朱以为朱以柱朱以迦朱艺峰朱艺员朱易兰朱易台朱屹瞻朱亿德朱逸惊朱逸伦朱逸青朱逸清朱逸生朱亦殿朱亦芳朱亦民朱亦仁朱亦中朱亦钊