| 词条 | writing 16 |
| 释义 | Today I read paragraph8 and paragraph9 of the article. The paragraph 8 is talking about employees, investors and consumers how to judge companies now. Author only cites two examples to explain that all too well the public impact of internal decisions. What are the decisions, like how deal with issues like ethnic diversity, harassment, hiring and firing, profit sharing and so on. With the two examples, we know laid [lay] off thousands of workers and failure to handle racial discrimination within its ranks both will bring bad public consciousness. And with this case, the company's profit will lower. So how to set a good public consciousness is become important. So in paragraph 9, the author is also talking about an example which with good public consciousness. The company is named Hearst Corporation. The company is celebrating differences among people and making active use of the varied perspectives that workers from different backgrounds bring to the job. In my point it is very good. This way will raise employee's enthusiasm, then raise company's profit. And this can make a good public consciousness. Good public consciousness also is a good brand. For a company, a good brand can bring much more profit imperceptibly. This will affect a company in long period of time. |
| 随便看 |
百科全书收录594082条中文百科知识，基本涵盖了大多数领域的百科知识，是一部内容开放、自由的电子版百科全书。