基本信息

内容简介

作者简介

目录

基本信息

书名：律师评价语言的社会符号学研究

作者：张丽萍

出版社：知识产权出版社

ISBN：978-7-5130-0685-9/D （3579）

出版时间：2011-11

版次：第一次印刷

开本：16开

页数：204页

图书分类：法律| 学术著作

定价：39元

内容简介

本书从社会符号学视角入手，综合韩礼德学派的话语分析模式与哈贝马斯的主体间性，针对当前司法改革中的实践问题——律师的法庭辩论语言进行语言学体系构建与理论解释；在理性思辨的基础上，依托实地采录的法庭辩论语料库，有效利用中西话语分析的研究成果，从宏观到微观深入分析了律师在辩论中如何发表评价性意见，揭示了貌似客观的律师话语中所隐含的主观性态度及表现形式，最终论证了律师理性辩论模式的适切性。

本书运用语言学理论来探讨法律交际领域中的具体问题，具有跨学科研究性质，涉及语言学、哲学、法学等学科知识，体现了应用语言学的社会实践价值，因此不仅对法律语言学、话语分析、应用语言学等专业的研究人员与学生有启发意义，对从事司法实践或研究法学文化的学者或学生也有实践参考价值，也合适做英语、法律爱好者的阅读材料。

读者对象法律语言学、话语分析、应用语言学等专业的研究人员与学生以及从事司法实践或研究法学文化的学者或学生。

作者简介

张丽萍，女，生于1973年11月1日，山西和顺人，南京理工大学外国语学院教师，副教授，硕士生导师，广东外语外贸大学应用语言学博士，法律语言学方向首批博士生。迄今为止，已发表各类法律语言学论文十余篇（其中CSSCI四篇），参加国际学术会议一次，主持或参与省厅/部级科研项目10项，参与校精品课程建设3项，承担或参与校教改项目2项，参与教材编撰2部。

目录

Contents

1 Introduction 1

1.1 Research orientation 2

1.2 Working definition 4

1.3 Rationale for this study 5

1.4 Objective and research questions 7

1.4.1 General objective 7

1.4.2 Specific research questions 7

1.5 Significance of this study 8

1.6 Research methodology and data collection 9

1.6.1 Research methodology 9

1.6.2 Data collection and description 9

1.7 Organization of this thesis 10

2 Literature Review 12

2.1 Introduction 12

2.2 The construct of lawyer evaluation 12

2.2.1 The origin of lawyer evaluation 12

2.2.2 The constituents of lawyer evaluation 14

2.3 Lawyer evaluation and context 16

2.4 Lawyer evaluation in context: a linguistic perspective 22

2.4.1 Lawyer evaluation identified in discourse 23

2.4.2 Two dimensions for the positioning of lawyer evaluation 29

2.4.3 Lawyer evaluation on the dimension of solidarity 30

2.5 Lawyer evaluation in context: a legal perspective 36

2.5.1 Major issues for lawyer evaluation 36

2.5.2 Predominant legal ideology 37

2.5.3 Habermasian interpretations of judicial communication 40

2.6 Summary 43

3 Theoretical Framework 45

3.1 Introduction 45

3.2 Lawyer evaluation, context and the dispute resolution 45

3.2.1 Socio-semiotic view of language 46

3.2.2 Constituents of lawyer evaluation 46

3.2.3 Legal contexts as determinants 53

3.2.4 The presentation of lawyer evaluation 59

3.2.5 Functions of lawyer evaluation in the trial 63

3.3 The theoretical framework 65

3.4 Summary 70

4 The Constituents of Lawyer Evaluation 72

4.1 Introduction 72

4.2 Lawyer evaluation as Affect 73

4.3 Lawyer evaluation as Judgement 76

4.3.1 Social Esteem 77

4.3.2 Social Sanction 79

4.3.3 Social Punishment 82

4.4 Lawyer evaluation as Appreciation 85

4.4.1 Reaction 85

4.4.2 Composition 88

4.4.3 Valuation 90

4.5 Summary 93

5 Lawyer Evaluation under Contextual Constraints 94

5.1 Introduction 94

5.2 Lawyer evaluation under constraints from the situational context 94

5.2.1 The situational context and its constraints 95

5.2.2 Lawyer evaluation in confrontation 95

5.3 Lawyer evaluation under the situation of culture 106

5.3.1 Habermasian law and rational confrontation 106

5.3.2 Lawyer evaluation in rational confrontation 108

5.4 Summary 117

6 Discursive Construction of Rational Lawyer Evaluation 118

6.1 Introduction 118

6.2 Equal role relationship 119

6.2.1 Underlining the common ground 119

6.2.2 Highlighting judicial knowledge 123

6.3 Multi-voiced discourse environment 126

6.3.1 Projection 127

6.3.2 Conjunctive adjuncts 131

6.3.3 Dialogical comment adjuncts 132

6.4 Diverging discursive community 134

6.4.1 Positive evaluation 135

6.4.2 Negative evaluation 138

6.4.3 Graded evaluation 141

6.5 Summary 145

7 Functions of Lawyer Evaluation 147

7.1 Introduction 147

7.2 Negotiating the determinacy in case facts 147

7.2.1 Scaling the case presentation 148

7.2.2 Graded judgment of case facts 154

7.3 Negotiating the categorical boundary in alleged charges 158

7.3.1 The interpretation of relevant legal rules 159

7.3.2 Prototypicality in legal charges 162

7.4 Negotiating the degree of law application 165

7.4.1 The selection of a specific rule 166

7.4.2 The degree of law application 168

7.5 Summary 169

8 Conclusion 171

8.1 Summary of the previous chapters 171

8.2 Major findings and conclusions 172

8.2.1 Major findings 172

8.2.2 Conclusions 173

8.3 Implications 175

8.3.1 Theoretical implications 175

8.3.2 Practical implications 177

8.4 Limitations 179

8.5 Suggestions for further study 179

APPENDICES 181

Appendix 1 Transcription notations 181

Appendix 2 Selected Trial Transcripts 183

Appendix 3 Article 5 of the Law of Unfair Competition 189

REFERENCES 190

后记204